Not signed in (Sign In)
  1.  
    Stephan - 17 hours ago

    Also in the Sunset June issue: the 20 best bike paths in the West. Coming in at number 5, San Diego's Bayshore Bikeway.


    Way to go Bayshore Bikeway! San Diego is moving in the right direction so as to attract tourist and locals to bike destinations throughout the county. That's good for the local economy and tourist industry. We need a bike share program downtown and around Balboa Park to help get us started catering bicycling to visitors.

    Coming in at # 10 .... Ventura to Ojai bike trail!
    Mark wrote about it when describing his adventures in Ojai in the spring.

    markphilips Apr 23rd 2012

    One of these days we plan to ride the Ventura to Ojai bike trail.



    10 | OJAI VALLEY TRAIL, OJAI, CA (9.5 miles)
    Go for a spectacular spin through the artsy city of Ojai – 35 miles south of Santa Barbara and 73 miles of Los Angeles. Every June, the city hosts a music festival at the local amphitheater. Stop to rock out or continue onward to explore the Los Padres National Forest. Stay on path, which seamlessly joins the Ventura River Trail (6 miles), to hit the beach and cool off with a dip.



    Biking seems to be rolling along nicely.

    OKB

  2.  
    Google map link
    According to one of my coworkers, a woman whose bike was hit by a car was on the northeast corner of this intersection when he saw her--so on Murphy Canyon near the 15 onramp yesterday...but I still haven't seen any news items on this.
    • CommentAuthorStephan
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2012
     
    Yes, SDCBC is looking into what it can do in the legal arena, but keep in mind that legal recourse is available in civil court for the injured party, which SDCBC or any other bike group typically is not.

    bossvoss:
    bikingbill:Why don't we have a bicycle organization that files legal actions in such cases?


    At the last SDCBC board meeting, decision was made to form a Legal Committee. If you are intersted in getting involved, let me know. We're definitely looking for lawyers, but others can get involved too. We still need to sort out the mission of the committee, so if you are interested you can help with that too.

    My e-mail is bossvoss at gmail period .com

    I am not a lawyer, I'm just helping to get this thing off the ground. It was a discussion in this forum that first inspired me to propose the idea of a Legal committee to SDCBC.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbikingbill
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2012
     
    We need to study how the motorcycle groups got the DA's to take driver misbehavior more seriously.
    • CommentAuthorbossvoss
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2012
     
    Garden hose prank poses danger to motorists
    http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jun/05/police-warn-dangerous-incidents-point-loma-and-ob/

    The article briefly mentions the hazards to cyclists (but not the headline)
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2012 edited
     
    bikingbill:Why don't we have a bicycle organization that files legal actions in such cases?

    The SDCBC in the process of forming a Legal Committee to address such issues.

    If anyone knows any lawyers with interest in bicycling, traffic law, etc., and are willing to donate some time for such a cause, please whisper me contact information. Thanks.

    (oops I see bossvoss already posted this information and similar request - sorry!)
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2012 edited
     
    batmick:What's even more galing in the report about the two investigations is the part about David Ortiz on Balboa. Unless they omitted a bit about some wrongdoing on Ortiz's partI am not sure how "driver and cyclist share responsbility" for the crash. Even if there is no bike lane, he had a right to ride there and when he gets run over by a car it is the driver's responisbility alone.

    I totally agree, and I think it's outrageous for the police to say something like this without a hint of what they think Ortiz might have been doing wrong. I mean, do they have evidence that he moved laterally without yielding, for example?

    Frankly, I get the impression they think he was wrong for riding a bike in the road!
    •  
      CommentAuthorbikingbill
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2012
     
    http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_20804178/el-cerrito-woman-93-dies-after-being-hit

    A 93-year-old El Cerrito woman hit by a bicyclist Wednesday as she took her afternoon walk died hours later at a nearby hospital, police said.

    A longtime resident, she lived just a block from where she was hit, said traffic Sgt. Shawn Maples.

    The collision happened about 5:30 p.m. as the woman was almost finished crossing Arlington Boulevard at the Brewster Drive intersection, Maples said.

    The cyclist, a 57-year-old El Cerrito man, was riding within the speed limit in a northbound bike lane on Arlington Boulevard and appeared to have seen the woman from some distance away, Maples said. The man called out to the woman, but "for some reason, he wasn't able to brake or take evasive action to miss her," Maples said.

    The woman fell to the ground and suffered a serious head wound. She was rushed by helicopter to the John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek, where she died shortly before midnight, Maples said. She had family members who live nearby, and they were at her bedside when she died, he said.

    :face-sad:
    •  
      CommentAuthormarkphilips
    • CommentTimeJun 11th 2012 edited
     
    Now if the law could understand that people on foot and people on bicycles are both PEOPLE vulnerable from speeding vehicles.:face-sad:

    http://www.fox5sandiego.com/news/kswb-driver-who-fatally-struck-hiker-sentenced-20120611,0,1775264.story?track=rss

    Judge Link told the defendant that he had to take responsibility for his own actions.

    "You killed somebody, based on stupidity,'' the judge said, "and you gotta pay for it.''
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 11th 2012
     
    30 days in jail and 90 days with an ankle bracelet keeping him at home. It hardly seems like enough.
  3.  
    Well, I suspect nothing would feel like enough. Judge Link is a straight-shooter, no-nonsense. One of my favorite judges for a number of reasons, including because he has common sense. He has been on the bench for quite some time and has seen quite a bit. My suspicion is that, comparatively, the sentence fit the crime. A tragedy nonetheless.
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2012
     
    Washington Post breaks the story - Armstrong charged with doping by USADA

    The PDF copy of the letter send by the USADA to Armstrong, Bruyneel and others: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/armstrongcharging0613.pdf <-- THIS IS A MUST READ

    They're saying they have evidence, primarily from the testimony of every US rider they contacted, of a massive doping conspiracy involving Armstrong, et al from 1998 to to the present day. They say Armstrong was the only US rider who did not cooperate with the investigation.

    If you read through that 15-page letter, it's pretty devastating. Armstrong will probably lose his 7 TDF titles as a result.

    In other totally unrelated news, I'm sure, Hincapie announces his retirement.
    Seriously, I bet George made a deal agreeing to retire in return for not being sanctioned for all the doping he admitted to doing with Armstrong.
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2012 edited
     
    San Francisco: Bicyclist charged in Castro pedestrian death

    A charge of felony vehicular manslaughter has been filed against Chris Bucchere, the bicyclist who fatally struck a 71-year-old pedestrian in the Castro back in March.
    ...
    Prosecutors concluded that Bucchere, 36, was grossly negligent in his riding before he ran into Sutchi Hui in a crosswalk at Market and Castro streets on March 29.
    ...
    As we previously reported, the problem wasn't that Bucchere ran a red light. Prosecutors believe the light was yellow when he rode into the intersection heading south on Castro.

    But before that, a motorist reported seeing Bucchere fly through several red lights and stop signs along Divisadero Street leading up to the intersection, according to police.

    Also, a tracker on Bucchere's bike allegedly showed he was riding faster than 35 mph in a 25 mph zone.

    Finally, a video from a surveillance camera at 17th and Market streets reportedly showed a hunched-over Bucchere speeding through the intersection, making little or no attempt to stop before hitting Hui.

    A posting that originated from Bucchere's e-mail address soon after the accident gave the following account: "I was already way too committed to stop. ... I couldn't see a line through the crowd and I couldn't stop, so I laid it down and just plowed through the crowded crosswalk in the least-populated place I could find."


    I think that's reasonable. Just would like to see motorists face felony vehicular manslaughter when they kill bicyclists. I guess the key is that "gross negligence" has to be demonstrated.
    • CommentAuthorgavilan
    • CommentTimeJun 14th 2012
     
    Did you guys read on bike snob about the Kings' celebration that, according to LA Police, was "well-behaved" but somehow, on the same sentence! it includes "cyclist trampled" ??? :face-plain:

    Bike Snob post:
    http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2012/06/sport-vs-mobility-stamp-of-approval.html

    Referenced article:
    http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/kings-fans-outside-staples-well-behaved-according-lapd-070507915--nhl.html

    Just... wow....
    • CommentAuthorbossvoss
    • CommentTimeJun 15th 2012
     
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2012 edited
     
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2012
     
    billd:Lawsuit against Strava:

    http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco&id=8706316
    http://www.mobilesportsreport.com/2012/06/lawsuit-jolts-athlete-app-world-is-strava-com-to-blame-for-cycling-accident-deaths/
    http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/family-files-suit-against-cycling-website-encourag/nPY3t/

    I don't see how Strava can be responsible for someone speeding out of control and hitting a car.

    For crying out loud.

    For the record, I'm trying to get faster on several descents, including Nautilus and the I-5 "chute" into Sorrento Valley, but if I crash, it's my fault!
    •  
      CommentAuthorbikingbill
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2012
     
    billd:Lawsuit against Strava:

    http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jun/19/strava-website-sued-over-bicyclists-death/
    http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco&id=8706316
    http://www.mobilesportsreport.com/2012/06/lawsuit-jolts-athlete-app-world-is-strava-com-to-blame-for-cycling-accident-deaths/
    http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/crime-law/family-files-suit-against-cycling-website-encourag/nPY3t/

    I don't see how Strava can be responsible for someone speeding out of control and hitting a car.


    I go faster than that every day I commute. Not having control of your bike, or riding appropriately for the road conditions, is not Strava's fault.
    • CommentAuthorJSnook
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2012
     
    I wonder if everyone would be so quick to jump to Strava's defense if it was used by motorists to see who could cover a route fastest in their car.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2012
     
    If the motorist was speeding and driving out of control, yes. Strava can't be held responsible for law breaking idiots.

    In addition to speeding and driving out of control being illegal, speed contests on open public roads in a motor vehicle are illegal.

    http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc23109.htm
  4.  
    Hmmmm. While not practicing in that arena, I would be surprised if the case against Strava made it to a jury. All kinds of issues: assumption of risk, causation, etc.
  5.  
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2012
     
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
     
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
     
    billd:New traffic signs alert drivers of cyclists

    Jeez. These signs are working faster than I expected. Cannot wait for them to go in in Leucadia. Can. Not. Wait.
    •  
      CommentAuthorsvelocity 
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
     
    • CommentAuthorerik
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2012
     
    Serge2:Jeez. These signs are working faster than I expected. Cannot wait for them to go in in Leucadia. Can. Not. Wait.

    Yeah, they put those signs up on 6th Ave. It is a nice reminder, but that is also kind of a dangerous street for cycling down. They should put some signs and reminders up on 4th and 5th; they have more space and slower traffic most days, and it would be good to encourage cyclists to use them instead.
    • CommentAuthorJayKay
    • CommentTimeJun 23rd 2012
     
    svelocity:Backlash regarding the BMUFL signs in the OB Rag


    just more evidence that left leaning groups are not always friends of bicyclists.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2012
     
    Put onus on drivers, says cycling world champion Mark Cavendish

    In most European countries the onus is on drivers to prove their innocence in collisions resulting in civil law suits for damages. The reverse is true in Britain, where cyclists or their families have to prove that the driver was at fault if they are to win a civil action.
    Supporters say that the difference may contribute to casualty rates that are far higher in Britain than on mainland Europe. A British cyclist is three times more likely to be killed than a rider in the Netherlands and twice as likely as a peer in Denmark or Germany. The UK, Ireland, Malta and Cyprus are the only countries in Western Europe without some degree of liability. In the Netherlands, the driver is presumed to be at fault in all civil cases involving children. Drivers are also held liable in Sweden, where compensation payments are paid through a charge levied on car insurance premiums.
    Asked what single change would be most likely to improve cycle safety, he said: “The realisation that a consequence will come without looking out for cyclists. If you hit a cyclist there is a life gone. If it is embedded in your culture that cyclists are around it just raises awareness. It has got to be an evolution over time.
    “That is the point. They don’t do it to penalise drivers over there. They do it so that drivers have to look. Ultimately in Belgium as well if a cyclist jumps a red light there is a severe punishment. I believe I am the first to stand up and say cyclists have to be more responsible as well. Cutting a red light might just aggravate someone who will take it out on a general cyclist.”
    • CommentAuthorStephan
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2012
     
    JayKay:
    svelocity:Backlash regarding the BMUFL signs in the OB Rag


    just more evidence that left leaning groups are not always friends of bicyclists.


    I've lived in OB almost 40 years and somehow never developed a habit of reading the OB Rag. I say this as a disclaimer so you know my opinion is based on a very small sample, but I've never read anything in the Rag I thought was worth my time. That is might be unfair to some of their writers, but that's been my experience.
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2012 edited
     
    svelocity:Backlash regarding the BMUFL signs in the OB Rag

    I love the comment from the guy who declares that the BMUFL signs contradict the CVC. He epitomizes the public, and, frankly, much of the cycling community, who do not understand the rights and best safety practices of cycling, especially on roads with lanes too narrow for safe side-by-side sharing within the lane.

    While the initial reaction includes a lot of backlash, at least the issue is getting awareness and attention from the general public, for the first time in my lifetime. Where this will go we can't know, but we'll be able to thank or blame sharrows and BMUFL signs some time in the future!
    •  
      CommentAuthorPacMUle
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2012
     
    here is a nice lil piece of feel good news about a 'earn a bike' program that incorporates some green learning too :) i did a program similar to this in middle school and loved it! enjoy...
    http://grist.org/list/these-adorable-kids-are-earning-bikes-by-helping-their-community/
    • CommentAuthorJayKay
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2012
     
    Hit and run on Nimitz. Strange that police know something about the victims. They must have stopped and then taken off.

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Bicyclist-Injured-in-Hit-and-Run-Crash-160958875.html
    • CommentAuthorVeloCafé
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    One step forward, two steps back. :face-crying:
    •  
      CommentAuthorjacobk
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012 edited
     
    VeloCafé:One step forward, two steps back. :face-crying:


    Nothing good can come of that. I'm not crazy about critical mass, but it doesn't sound like those pedestrians were entirely without blame, since she started by shouting obscenities and her husband:

    "He grabbed the bike and hurled it at the approaching pack, and eight or 10 riders collided. He tussled with one rider until everyone got back on their bikes and continued north."
    •  
      CommentAuthorbatmick
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    Well, if I were out for a walk with my family and a horde of bikes came rushing by like, sadly, many CM rides do, I might loose my cool too and make myself heard. Whoever thought it a good idea to take the group down the boardwalk holds ultimate responsibility for this incident, imho.

    I am not a friend of CM and frankly think that it does more harm than good these days.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjacobk
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    My girlfriend and I were actually walking on the sidewalk down 6th ave last friday. I forgot that it was the night for critical mass, but we were walking right when they were all leaving the park. Most of them were in the street on 6th, but it seemed like probably >= 15% of riders there were still riding on the sidewalk (why?). We just got out of the way until they passed.

    I'd agree that it does more harm then good.
  6.  
    Shitty. I don't do critical mass anymore and haven't in a few years but it seems like this will give cyclists a bad name for a moment. Especially us "brake less hipsters"
    • CommentAuthorVeloCafé
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    It does take two to tango but in my opinion the ride should never have been there in the first place. Ive always said the ride has no purpose going onto the boardwalk, or sidewalks as jacobk mentioned. Pedestrians aren't the bane of cyclists - why are we there and what does that have anything to do with the purpose of CM. The ride should keep to the streets; take Mission Blvd if they want to ride up to PB & LJ. I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here.

    sykkelspruce:Shitty. I don't do critical mass anymore and haven't in a few years but it seems like this will give cyclists a bad name for a moment. Especially us "brake less hipsters"
    I read a thread on one of the news stories about a push to ban fixed gear bikes from use on streets because they don't have brakes and therefore aren't safe for road use. I only wish we could use that logic to some motorists and their brains.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    My fixed gear path racer has a front brake. It's suicidal to ride on the street without one. I try not to use it because controlling speed with the legs is good exercise, but it comes in handy for sudden events.
    • CommentAuthorerik
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    VeloCafé:I read a thread on one of the news stories about a push to ban fixed gear bikes from use on streets because they don't have brakes and therefore aren't safe for road use. I only wish we could use that logic to some motorists and their brains.


    CVC 21201(a) states that all bikes opperated on the road need at least one brake. In NY, I am pretty sure the law explicitly required both a front and rear brake, but fixed gears got a pass on the rear because you can technically stop the wheel by pedaling backwards (no one was exempt from a front brake). I am not sure if that logic stands here, but it seems like expanding that law to two brakes would solve the problem rather simply.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbikingbill
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    Well that would mess up all the coaster braked cruisers.
  7.  
    Equipment Requirements. VC 21201

    a) No person shall operate a bicycle on a roadway unless it is equipped with a brake which will enable the operator to make one braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement.

    In this reasoning wouldn't a brakeless track bike comply due to the fact that you can skid the rear wheel on dry, level, clean pavement?

    I do have a front brake on my bike to avoid tickets and for an emergency if needed. I rode for years without one until I moved here. I don't think there should be a requirement to have even one let alone two. As wpstoll said, he doesn't use his to stop and either do I but I also stop at lights/stop signs & follow laws. I think there is a lot of people on fixed gears and all other types of bikes that run lights and do dumb shit on bikes it just sucks to be lumped into that category if you ride a track bike.
    Obviously it was dumb for the group to be on that boardwalk. I just think its funny that it goes straight into fixed gear hate in the comments.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    If this were a news story it would have appeared in Saturday's U-T. Printing it days later indicates to me that the intent was sensationalism. That's fine for the boulevard press, but disappointing from the city's only daily newspaper. The U-T continues its slide from journalistic integrity. Judging from the editorial stories printed on page A-1 and the continuing shameless electioneering, the paper is now nothing more than a bully pulpit for its new owner.

    Spinning is good exercise, but to get anywhere quickly on a fixed gear I find myself pushing an 81 inch gear, 45 x 15. I am spun out at about 35 mph. I can't lock up the rear wheel unless I'm turning something like a 45 x 23. That's fine for hill climbing, but it would take me forever to ride ten miles.
  8.  
    I think there are a lot of kids that hop on track bikes because it's "cool" or whatever and are riding beyond their abilities but I don't think it's always the case. I don't advocate what happened obviously, I just don't like the fact that all people that ride fixed gear bikes on the street get lumped into the same "reckless hipster" category. I think when people ride recklessly it hurts the cycling community regardless of what bike they are on.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    I agree. I also resent the implication that at 53 and 55 my wife and I are doddering elderly people. Had we been walking on the boardwalk at that fated moment, I'm sure we would have heard CM coming in time to simply step out of the way. Rather than using the encounter as an excuse for confrontation, I'm pretty sure our reaction would have been one of amusement. Sounds to me as if the couple may have been looking to start something. Great apes are hard wired to be territorial.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    In any case, CM shouldn't be on the board walk. It's supposed to be about the road. It doesn't really matter if the pedestrians were drunk or jerks. The people who led CM down the boardwalk are still idiots. Idiot vs. idiot: nobody to side with.

    This general attitude is why I only did CM a few times and gave up. There are too many people looking to make it into a confrontation.
    • CommentAuthorStephan
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    From SDNews.com

    New lane-sharing symbols don’t mean street takeover by bicyclists in PB, OB

    Nice work by SDCBC Executive Director Andy Hanshaw to get the full story across about sharrows.
    • CommentAuthorerik
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    sykkelspruce:In this reasoning wouldn't a brakeless track bike comply due to the fact that you can skid the rear wheel on dry, level, clean pavement?

    I do have a front brake on my bike to avoid tickets and for an emergency if needed. I rode for years without one until I moved here. I don't think there should be a requirement to have even one let alone two.

    Yeah, that is kind of what I was saying: in NY, the ability to make the back wheel skid on pavement counts as a brake, but the law requires brakes on both wheels, so no one can avoid having at least one real brake. I totally respect people who can stop a track bike rapidly on a street, but that requires some training and skill; given the popularity of fixed gear bikes among people who have no yet gained that skill, I believe a requirement for a front brake would be perfectly reasonable and improve road safety.

    bikingbill:Well that would mess up all the coaster braked cruisers.

    True. It would not be that bad to add a front brake to many of them, but I can understand the hesitancy to make that a requirement. That is not a very popular bike style around NY, so I guess they felt no qualms about this effect of the law.

    A bit more topically:
    Stephan:
    Nice work by SDCBC Executive Director Andy Hanshaw to get the full story across about sharrows.

    It is amazing how many drivers seem to have no idea what the sharrow means. I also like how that article called out cyclists to ride the right direction and in the road. Good message all around.
    • CommentAuthorSerge2
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    George Hincapie, Levi Leipheimer, Christian Vande Velde and David Zabriskie will testify about their doping with Lance Armstrong.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/sports/cycling/former-teammates-to-testify-against-armstrong.html?pagewanted=all