Not signed in (Sign In)
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2009
     
    I know of William's efforts along Jamacha Blvd, but I thought it would be nice to ramp it up a notch.
    •  
      CommentAuthortawnya
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2009
     
    Roundabouts were very common in residential Seattle neighborhoods, and I was amazed at most drivers inabilty to understand them. It seems that the average belief is that it is a little-used intersection to warrant one, so you should just blow through it at full speed. Stop signs may not be as pretty, bit they're more effective and less expensive. I can not even count how many near-misses I've witnessed in a roundabout heavy area in the two years I lived in one.
    •  
      CommentAuthormissler
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2009
     
    drivers have no idea how to use them in most cases.

    here in north county there aren't many, only ones i know of are the ones on leucadia blvd and a few through a residential neighborhood in vista. our lunch ride regularly winds through said neighborhood, and although we riders use them correctly i have yet to see a driver follow suit. i've seen the "but i'm turning left, why should i go all around the circle?!" move where they just whip left and go the WRONG WAY through the roundabout, that one's my personal favorite.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeJul 31st 2009
     
    Most motorists have no idea what a yield sign means. Seriously.
  1.  
    LIKE A JET PLANE!!!

    The SD Velo Heroes have logged 737 miles so far on greenlightride.com since we started the team. I haven't yet found a competition in which we can partake, but it's still fun to log those miles and see them add up. Maybe we'll have a picnic party when we hit 1000? Shapps is in the lead with 391! Go Shapps!

    For any who would like to join us (I know we've gotten some new users since we started the team) go to greenlightride.com, create a username and then search teams and find SD Velo Heroes and click to join.
    •  
      CommentAuthoril Pirati
    • CommentTimeAug 7th 2009
     
    .

    So to continue the discussion of my ongoing legal battles from the "How was the commute" thread...

    Kathy Keehan from SDCBC responded to my email. Went something like this:

    "Andrew, I'm very sorry to hear about this. We've been working with the Police Department about this very issue, and you are the third person who I know of who has been cited under 21202. We would be happy to help you with your appeal. . . At this point, we'll probably have to find a lawyer willing to work with you on the appeal."

    So that's awesome. I look forward to working with them, and hopefully educating the SDPD and the Traffic Court about cyclists' rights.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 7th 2009
     
    Here is how to complain to the FCC about DJs who threaten bicyclists (the instructions below relate to the shock jocks in Detroit mentioned in this thread.:

    1. Go to the FCC Complaint site
    2. Choose complaint type: Broadcast (TV and Radio), Cable, and Satellite Issues
    3. Choose complaint category: Unauthorized, unfair, biased, illegal broadcasts (does NOT include Obscene, Profane or Indecent material) which includes "broadcasting threatening or intimidating statements about an individual or group"
    4. The Online form is recommended
    5. Greater Media is the owner of WCSX.
    6. Frequency is 94.7
    7. Radio station is based in Detroit, MI
    8. Date of program: 08/05/2009
    9. The tirade was aired at 6AM
    10. I sent in a brief copy of the transcript:
    "How many of us drivers are disgusted with how bicyclists take to the road. … I’m sorry, they’re jerks. I doubt very much that any cyclist would have the gumption to call us, but how many of them have seen a bicyclist and would just LOVE to lob something at their heads? … God forbid we try to get by them! The guy on the bike is doing 19 m.p.h., they won’t get over, … and it is just flat-out arrogance. … OH GOD, you just want to go Grand Theft Auto on them. … Just move over. That’s all I’m saying. … I don’t see why they are so arrogant. They are riding something which against your 4,000 pound vehicle could launch them like an acorn."
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 7th 2009
     
    And regarding Il Pirati's recent troubles...I am not a lawyer and don't know if this would be problematic but if you have lawyer friends perhaps you could ask their advice. How about filing a complaint with the SDPD? From this website:

    Any citizen who is dissatisfied with police services or believes they have witnessed or been a victim of police misconduct can file a complaint:

    * In person at any police facility
    * By telephone to the Internal Affairs Unit at (619)531-2801
    * With the Citizens Review Board on Police Practices at:

    202 C Street MS 9A
    San Diego, CA 92101
    (619) 236-6296
    Email: citizensreviewboard@sandiego.gov

    Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBev
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2009
     
    Done! Just efiled my FCC complaint. Thanks for the directions, Sam!
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 11th 2009
     
    Rep. Susan Davis represents the 53rd district of CA which includes all the zipcodes here. She is also a member of the Congressional Bicycle Caucus "which supports public policy options that will encourage more Americans to leave the car at home and cycle to work and for recreation." The Bike Caucus was founded by Rep. Blumenauer from OR.

    I had emailed Rep. Davis asking her to support H.R. 1443 (summary), the Complete Streets Act of 2009. I knew she was not on House Transportation Committee I did want her to ask her colleagues to support the measure. Below is her response:

    Thank you for contacting me with your support for H.R. 1443, the Complete Streets Act of 2009. It was good to hear from you and I welcome the opportunity to respond to your comments.

    As you may know, H.R. 1443 would require each state to have a law or policy statement requiring all federally-funded transportation projects to follow "complete streets principles." These principles would state that transportation projects must ensure the safety and convenience of all users of the transportation system, including: pedestrians, bicyclists, public transit users, children, older individuals, motorists, and individuals with disabilities.

    As the representative from San Diego, I understand the need for more reliable and safe public transportation options. In addition, I am a member of the Congressional Bicycle Caucus, which supports public policy options that will encourage more Americans to leave the car at home and cycle to work and for recreation. In each of these cases, safety is paramount - and this bill is seems worthy of serious consideration in that regard.

    Although I do not serve on the House Transportation Committee, I will most certainly pass your support along to my colleagues on that committee. I will monitor H.R. 1443 as it works its way through the legislative process and keep your thoughts firmly in mind should I have the chance to vote on it on the House floor.

    Thanks again for being in touch. As your representative, I both need and value your input. If you are interested in receiving regular updates about what is happening in Congress, please sign up for my E-Newsletter at www.house.gov/susandavis.

    With warm regards,
    SUSAN A. DAVIS
    Member of Congress


    In other Rep. Davis news....

    She will be in San Diego during the month of August holding Town Hall style meetings. She will be present at a "Green Jobs' Forum on 8/29 at San Diego Workforce Partnership, 3910 University Ave. I've emailed her and asked her to "address increasing transportation investment for non-motorized transportation." I hope to make it to the Town Hall meeting and maybe get some courage to talk to her. I quoted this study in stating how the economy will also grow if she promotes investment in the bicycle industry. According to the study, Portland's bicycle industry is worth $90M and has grown 40% since 2006.

    That is all the advocacy efforts I have to report for today :)
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2009
     
    From Sammy's bicycle advocacy chamber, another letter has been written. This time to City Councilmember Todd Gloria:


    Dear Representative Gloria,

    As a resident of North Park, I feel blessed to live as beautiful of a city as San Diego. The weather is perfect every single day. And as a bicyclist, I couldn't have dreamed of a better place to live in.

    By choice, my husband and I use my bicycle as our sole mode of transportation. I am sure you are aware of the multiple benefits of having your constituents on bicycles on a regular basis. Personally, it means that it keeps one less car off the freeway which means less contribution to smog, traffic jams and other related problems. It means that one more person is healthier and as I can strongly attest, happier.

    Unfortunately, I am very dismayed to hear of increasing instances where the San Diego Police department has begun ticketing bicyclists for following the law and what is worse, judges upholding that mistaken understanding of the vehicle code. Specifically, California Vehicle Code 21202 which states:

    (a) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the following situations:

    (1) When overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle proceeding in the same direction.

    (2) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

    (3) When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions(including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, orsubstandard width lanes) that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge, subject to the provisions of Section 21656. For purposes of this section, a “substandard width lane” is a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.

    (4) When approaching a place where a right turn is authorized.

    (b) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway of a highway, which highway carries traffic in one direction only and has two or more
    marked traffic lanes, may ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of that roadway as practicable.
    ---------------------

    In this year alone, there have been two 21202 citations mistakenly handed out and then upheld in the courts in San Diego. What is worse is that the bicyclists charged with the violations had not violated section 21202.

    I strongly urge you, to speak out and urge that the San Diego Police Department educate its officers on what the law actually is when bicyclists are concerned. I also urge you to connect with the judicial members in the San Diego court system to refamiliarize themselves with
    what the vehicle code 21202 actually states.

    As a bicyclist, I abhor flagrant violations of the law, but I do not want to lose faith in those that are supposedly there to serve and protect me.

    Sincerely,
    sso
    address


    And yes, I realized I called Todd Gloria a rep...I guess I should have referred to him as "councilmember". I am still an advocate in training. I am also adopting a strong "wait and see" approach to all this emailing. If nothing comes of it, I'll at least know whether to vote for the incumbent or not come election time.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2009
     
    And damn it with my typos. I need my own personal editor.
    •  
      CommentAuthoril Pirati
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2009
     
    .

    That's awesome. I'll write one also!
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2009
     
    Another tip: show up to meetings. You'd be suprised what showing up does.<blockquote><cite> sso:</cite> She will be in San Diego during the month of August holding Town Hall style meetings. She will be present at a "Green Jobs' Forum on 8/29 at San Diego Workforce Partnership, 3910 University Ave. I've emailed her and asked her to "address increasing transportation investment for non-motorized transportation." I hope to make it to the Town Hall meeting and maybe get some courage to talk to her. I quoted this <a href="http://www.altaplanning.com/oregon+bicycling+economic+study+update.aspx">study</a> in stating how the economy will also grow if she promotes investment in the bicycle industry. According to the study, Portland's bicycle industry is worth $90M and has grown 40% since 2006. That is all the advocacy efforts I have to report for today :)</blockquote> Thanks: I'm going to try to be there for the 8/29 forum. Green jobs should include green transportation. And not just those funky hybrids either.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2009
     
    William:Another tip: show up to meetings. You'd be suprised what showing up does.


    Thanks: I'm going to try to be there for the 8/29 forum. Green jobs should include green transportation. And not just those funky hybrids either.


    *ahem* a certain someone was not at the SDCBC meeting when the Jamacha Blvd was on the agenda.

    Speaking of which, my husband and I are planning on riding toward Jamacha at the end of the month with some garbage bags and brooms to survey the area behind the k-rails. Figured if no one is going to move the damn thing, we can at least clean up the part behind so it is somewhat nice and safe to ride on. Anyone interested in riding along with us?
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite> sso:</cite><blockquote><cite> William:</cite>Another tip: show up to meetings. You'd be suprised what showing up does.</blockquote>

    Thanks: I'm going to try to be there for the 8/29 forum. Green jobs should include green transportation. And not just those funky hybrids either.</blockquote>

    *ahem* a certain someone was not at the SDCBC meeting when the Jamacha Blvd was on the agenda.

    Speaking of which, my husband and I are planning on riding toward Jamacha at the end of the month with some garbage bags and brooms to survey the area behind the k-rails. Figured if no one is going to move the damn thing, we can at least clean up the part behind so it is somewhat nice and safe to ride on. Anyone interested in riding along with us?</blockquote>

    You know me and SDCBC... Frankly, I just don't want to attend a meeting at an organization where some of the members advocate that bike lanes are un needed and unsafe... and other reasons... I think Kathy is a SAINT and very much see Jim Baross as a modern model of gentle advocacy.. but the others raise a level of bile that make my presence counter productive, as I am very poor at NOT being vocal when confronted with what I believe is stupidity. I'm becoming a firm believer in "take singular action, live by what you believe" in stead of the "join the most similar mass". Using the SDGIB blog theory, we all have our individual pursuits and ideals, but have a common belief that cycling is a good thing...

    Last week I found out someone from my Iraq tour had committed suicide; and that prompted doing a ceremony for those of us who are local and getting something to send the family. Along with this, it just deemed some alone time was needed.

    I rode through there Jamacha on Sunday playing on the MTB, in fact, I'll try to ride this weekend with a camera: I'm thinking of making a montage video.. of the area to put up on the jamacha blog.... there is A LOT to do back there, but sadly, it won't work for cyclist: they use the barriers as "pinch points" causing you to HAVE to dismount and then appear in traffic.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeAug 22nd 2009
     
    Be sure to read the letter printed by the U-T on the back page of the Our San Diego section in this morning's paper (Saturday, Aug. 22). A retired bus driver from Spring Valley claims that 90% of cyclists are law-breakers. I would like to see the study that supports that statistic, although I'm pretty sure he just made it up. In the interest of fairness, the U-T needs to print my response next week, but I'm not holding my breath.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2009 edited
     
    I just heard back from Councilman Gloria's' office:
    Dear sso,

    Thank you for your email. Councilmember Gloria asked me to respond to you on his behalf. Councilmember Gloria is aware of this issue and has been in touch with members of the cycling community, the San Diego Police Department, and the City Attorney's office about it. The last we heard was the City Attorney's office was working with SDPD to ensure that officers do not wrongly ticket cyclists. This was at the end of June. Has there been any further incidents of citations since the end of June? If so, I would be happy to follow up.

    Kind Regards,

    Travis Knowles


    So...does anyone know the answer to Travis' question?

    Additionally, I had also sent the same letter that I sent to Councilmember Gloria to SDPD Chief Landsdowne. Have not heard back from the chief.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeAug 25th 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite> ray333:</cite>Be sure to read the letter printed by the U-T on the back page of the Our San Diego section in this morning's paper (Saturday, Aug. 22). A retired bus driver from Spring Valley claims that 90% of cyclists are law-breakers. I would like to see the study that supports that statistic, although I'm pretty sure he just made it up. In the interest of fairness, the U-T needs to print my response next week, but I'm not holding my breath.</blockquote>

    Funny. My biggest problem riding is bus drivers. Specifically, the 7 on University. Forever speeding past just to drive back in and push a person over. Honestly, I worry more about bus drivers than anyone else. Spring valley, as it is, has very few bus routes that are on crowded streets, so I'm not sure I understand.... OH EXCEPT ON JAMACHA BLVD.. where the bike lane has been blocked for a year.

    The retired bus driver has a lot of time to complain right now, and probably just enjoy's the attention. Did the article have a name?
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeAug 25th 2009
     
    It appears that the author is living in Spring Valley but is a retired driver for San Diego Transit. The letter to the editor was printed on the back page of the Our San Diego section where letters dealing with local issues are found every Saturday. I responded by turning each point around and suggesting that SDPD traffic officers should aggressively cite scofflaw bus drivers, providing three examples of recent incidents I have had, from running a red light directly in front of me to crowding me into parked cars on University (the 7!). We'll see if I get equal treatment, but except for the Just Fix It column, the U-T has been notoriously anti-cyclist. What burns me is that every time a bum on a department store MTB gets hit by a car while riding against traffic or is involved in a violent crime, the U-T always characterizes the miscreant as a "cyclist."
    • CommentAuthorthom
    • CommentTimeAug 25th 2009
     
    I'm posting this in several threads so folks will be sure to see it:

    A small group of San Diego bicycle bloggers has just launched a new site called, appropriately, Bike San Diego. Drawing inspiration from sites such as BikePortland and Streetsblog, the primary mission of Bike San Diego is simple: to provide a one-stop source for bicycle-related news, events, and advocacy in America's Finest City. This is an all-volunteer effort at citizen journalism by and for bicycle riders in metro San Diego and San Diego County.

    BikeSD.org is in pre-launch status right now; the site is up and content is flowing, but the editors are accepting suggestions from the community as the site takes shape. This is your site, riders of San Diego, be the change you would like to see in the world and help us provide content that is relevant to you! Please send your comments, suggestions and tips by filling out the Contact Us form at BikeSD.org.
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeAug 26th 2009
     
    The U-T printed my response this morning, heavily edited, to the retired bus driver's letter to the editor. Others also felt he was out of line. There are two more letters defending cyclists and one that also vilifies bus drivers. See section B.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 26th 2009
     
    ray333:The U-T printed my response this morning, heavily edited, to the retired bus driver's letter to the editor. Others also felt he was out of line. There are two more letters defending cyclists and one that also vilifies bus drivers. See section B.


    For those among us who do not subscribe to the UT:
    The original letter
    and the responses.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeAug 26th 2009 edited
     
    I thought I'd mention a strategy my husband, Fred, occasionally uses when he encounters rude drivers. He gives them a $1 bill. His rational: nothing is free and since the driver "taught him a lesson," he is paying them for it. Secondly, it always has disarmed the driver and made them apologetic to a point where a rational discussion of road rules and safety can be had. I don't have the guts to do this yet (plus I never carry cash on me), but Fred's got the balls...so to speak. :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeAug 26th 2009
     
    iQue cojones! Great idea! Better yet, for appropriate instances, why not staple a buck to a half-sheet copy of cvc21202? Bilateral lessons with monetary consideration, all bases covered legally.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeAug 27th 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite> sso:</cite>I thought I'd mention a strategy my husband, Fred, occasionally uses when he encounters rude drivers. He gives them a $1 bill. His rational: nothing is free and since the driver "taught him a lesson," he is paying them for it. Secondly, it always has disarmed the driver and made them apologetic to a point where a rational discussion of road rules and safety can be had. I don't have the guts to do this yet (plus I never carry cash on me), but Fred's got the balls...so to speak. :)</blockquote>

    Genious. @#$@#$ Genious. I'm going to start handing out parking tickets for bike lane violations. My measly allowance will affoard a little bit of a fine for them.

    That's funny, I don't care who you are.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSigurd
    • CommentTimeAug 27th 2009
     
    On my ride today I came across the following sign (haven't seen it in San Diego yet!):

    Photobucket

    My knee-jerk reaction to the sign is "great, another sign supporting bike riders", but upon further reflection I am not so sure: CVC 21202 applies to all roadways regardless of if posted or not, and posting it may cause uninformed car drivers to conclude that this code does not apply wherever not specifically posted.

    A bit like the pro or con bike lane argument; I know!
    • CommentAuthorthom
    • CommentTimeAug 27th 2009
     
    If I were a driver who didn't believe bicyclists had rights, and I encountered this sign I would assume the meaning is: "expect bicycles anywhere in the lane, not just in the gutter where you think they should be." Or maybe, "this is the one place it's NOT okay to scream at a bicyclist in the road."

    Where is this, BTW?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSigurd
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    thom:Where is this, BTW?
    San Francisco, specifically near the southern end of Golden Gate Bridge.

    The road that has this sign is on is traveled by scores of bicyclists and cars alike, and is narrow and twisty. It is also on a hill so that bike riders could be riding fast: It would be dangerous for a bicyclist not to take the lane in this location, so if there ever was a good place for this particular sign, it would be here!
    •  
      CommentAuthorHMeins
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    This looks like the road from the parking area at the south end of the bridge that leads down to Crissy Field below the Presidio.

    These signs have been posted in the Bay Area for years now. I believe the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition lobbied successfully for their installation. When the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition is as militant and effective as SFBC in dealing with local government, we can expect to see a great deal more meaningful accommodation of cyclists here. Unfortunately we are far too tolerant of ineffective government and logjam stonewalling politics.

    Take Kearny Villa Road as an example. Two cyclists dead since 2001 and all local government has been compelled to do so far is to install of couple of SHARE THE ROAD signs. The long term solution proposed is to paint the bike lanes blue, as if that will stop speeding traffic from running down cyclists at the deadly transition ramp. Meanwhile, all four traffic lanes have been neatly repaved while the bike lanes were left unridable in places, largely due to ineffective and stupid patching attempts by asphalt road crews.

    Time to call Mr. Nathan Batchelder at District 7 once again to see what progress is being made here. 236-6677.
    •  
      CommentAuthoril Pirati
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    .

    I tend to agree with the idea that signs which affirm an existing right do more overall harm then good. On that specific road cyclists may be safer, but the “exception proves the rule” mentality is put into effect.
    This is certainly extreme, and I’m not saying I’m for it, but I wonder if cyclists would be better off if we actually removed all “Bike Route” signs, bike lanes, and anything else that differentiates any one roadway from another. Studies have shown that cars pass closer to cyclists when cyclists are in a bike lane then when they are not, and I think they pass faster also (but I can’t prove it).
    This is getting longer than I intended, but worth some discussion? I’ve been reading Tom Vanderbilt’s Traffic lately. Lots of food for thought.
    • CommentAuthorjimbaross
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    Sorry I don't get to read here too often; lots of good discussion and ideas!

    il Priati has a good point that I often hear during discussions about new traffic control devices. Someday bicycling and walking (and NEVs, etectera) may regain/attain equal or maybe even superior status/acceptance on our public roadways. But maybe until then, or as part of the process toward this goal, lots of different approaches to changing the motor traffic culture may be appropriate.

    Though somewhat tongue-in-cheek, I've often recommended that, like the required health risk warnings on all cigarette packages, all motor vehicles should have a warning printed at the top of their windshields. Something like:
    "Roads are for people not just people in cars."
    "Motor Vehicle operation is hazardous to all living things. Drive less. Drive carefully."
    "You are operating a potentially deadly device. Use extreme caution."
    "Yield to all living things; pedestrians, bicyclists, animals, other vehicle operators."
    "Wouldn't you rather be bicycling?"

    Or, what would be your favorite?

    Jim Baross
    •  
      CommentAuthorSigurd
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    ray333:This looks like the road from the parking area at the south end of the bridge that leads down to Crissy Field below the Presidio.
    Yupp, you got it!
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite> Njord Noatun:</cite><blockquote><cite> ray333:</cite>This looks like the road from the parking area at the south end of the bridge that leads down to Crissy Field below the Presidio. </blockquote> Yupp, you got it!</blockquote>

    I used to live about a mile from there, just off Baker beach. Man what a GREAT area. San Diego is home, but SF will always have a place in my heart.
    • CommentAuthorthom
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2009
     
    Has anyone seen the new "Lose the Roaditude" posters? SSO tells me she saw one at Park and University this morning. I've posted all four bike-related posters from the campaign at Bike San Diego and asked readers to respond. Head over there and tell us what you think about them.
    • CommentAuthorDrew
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2009
     
    Yeah, I saw the bikes go with traffic one on the back of a bus in Mission Valley yesterday. Went to the site to check out the rest. Over all I think it's a good start.
    Though I would like to see them put one in there about bikes having use of the lane. I think that would do more to change behavior and cement the reality of the vehicle code. But you can't have it all. I wish it luck.
    • CommentAuthorthom
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2009
     
    One of the posters actually does say that "these lanes are bike lanes, too" or something to that effect, which is probably my favorite of the campaign. Haven't seen one in the wild yet, though.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2009
     
    The "these lanes are bike lanes too" cracks me up:

    Didn't Fresh squezed AJ just get a ticket for not "being far enough right"?

    I both like and dislike the campaign. If we could influence behavior on all sides by posters: it'd be cool.

    The problem: unless it includes a 1 dollar burger or a near naked woman: most people don't pay it mind. Now, I haven't had intrest in a burger in a while and somehow, I don't think nudity and safe driving go hand in hand (there are probably a web site or two about that tho..). The intentions are good, but I think, perhaps something better could be done with it.

    I'm going to start a new series on my blog: "@#$#@ up bike lanes in SD".
    • CommentAuthorkyle
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2009
     
    ^nude bicycle safety posters?! brilliant, William!

    Riding on La Jolla Blvd past Tourmaline beach recently, I noticed that they converted the southbound right lane between Turquoise and Loring from a car lane to a dedicated bike lane. It was good to see because it was a pretty hectic spot to ride: skinny lanes and parallel parked cars on the right. Great to see! It makes me wonder what prompted it. Kudos to whoever made it happen! It'd be great to know who in the city is listening to suggestions and/or making things like that happen.
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2009
     
    Now this looks like a much more useful message that I would have liked to see:
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2009
     
    Or even this one:
    • CommentAuthorSam
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2009
     
    So...my boss rode to work today. He also rode on Critical Mass after I raved about it and apparently had a lot of fun. I would invite my boss to these boards, but then there would be a long trail of evidence linking me to using company time to post here. I kinda like having a job, so that won't happen anytime soon.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2009
     
    You know what's screwed up? I want to redo my 70's era kitchen. To get a loan, they want 12% interest for a "consumer" loan. For a car? I could get the equal in a car for 4.5% interest. Has nothing to do with credit (we score REALLY high). Cars, really?
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2009
     
    Njord Noatun:On my ride today I came across the following sign (haven't seen it in San Diego yet!):

    Photobucket

    My knee-jerk reaction to the sign is "great, another sign supporting bike riders", but upon further reflection I am not so sure: CVC 21202 applies to all roadways regardless of if posted or not, and posting it may cause uninformed car drivers to conclude that this code does not apply wherever not specifically posted.

    A bit like the pro or con bike lane argument; I know!
    Simple solution: we need these where ever there is a narrow lane.

    Today I was riding South through Encinitas. The parking spaces are diagonal there, and there often isn't enough space for a car alone in the right lane if one of the parked cars is a particularly long pickup. It's also a 25mph zone. I'm in the middle of the lane because it's way too narrow to share, and most cars move into the next lane but one dumbass just had to stay as much in the right lane as possible and missed me by maybe three inches. It's a clear violation of C.V.C. 21750, not to mention dangerous and aggressive. He was shocked that I would flip him off. I caught up to him at the stop sign and yelled "the lane is too narrow for a bike and car and passing close is illegal!" He didn't respond and just drove off.
    •  
      CommentAuthoril Pirati
    • CommentTimeSep 7th 2009
     
    .

    ^^ Yeah, its hard to repossess a kitchen.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSigurd
    • CommentTimeSep 7th 2009
     
    il Pirati:.Yeah, its hard to repossess a kitchen.


    True -- loans against a marketable collateral, such as a car, would be cheaper than one without, or secondary priority, collateral.

    I would like to think about it this way, however: The US Taxpayer is directly subsidizing auto companies in a serious way. Auto financing companies are owned by that auto companies (GMAC, etc.), so the tax payer subsidies are also enabling auto companies to offer below-market interest rates. So, ultimately the tax payer is subsidizing auto sales.

    Last time I looked, fixed rate home mortgages were above 5%: If auto loans are at 4.5%, this certainly suggests that auto loans are "too cheap", and that we are all paying to get more cars on the road. I don't like it, but that's how it is.



    PS! I am not arguing against the stimulus package in general here, but I question if saving auto manufacturers (or investment banks, but that's another story!) whose own failed policies was the direct reason for their failure is sending the right signal as to where we want our economy to be heading.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeSep 15th 2009
     
    I was thinking that sign would make a great jersey.

    Also, there was an interesting one on Santa Fe St, just South of Damon Ave. It said "Bikes in Lane" and had a figure of a bicycle in the middle of the lane. I don't currently have a working digital camera or I would take/post a picture. I last went by there on Friday. There's some construction going on so they've narrowed the lane on the East (Northbound) side.
    • CommentAuthorbilld
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2009 edited
     
    A little late, but I didn't see this until this morning:

    Transportation Enhancements under Attack Again !
    •  
      CommentAuthorSigurd
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2009 edited
     
    Njord Noatun:Photobucket
    billd:I was thinking that sign would make a great jersey.
    Now that's a great idea (if you were referring to the above)! I found a full-resolution, over-size graphic here - now where do I go to get a good quality T-shirt made with this graphic?

    Edit: Group order, anyone?

    Photobucket
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaul
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2009
     
    Love it as a shirt. I'm in.

    Riding North on Harbor today, I came to a line of cars waiting to make the right turn on to 32nd. They tend to encroach on the bike lane, which is partially encroached on by untrimmed bushes on the right. Long story short, trying to squeeze between a bush and a car, I smacked a mirror, destroying the plastic housing and cutting my finger. I felt a little responsible because I could have stopped rather than trying to squeeze but there was nowhere for me to go. I need to go back and look, but I think the bike lane might technically end before the spot where I connected with the car. Kind of a shitty move by SD because that part of Harbor connects to the Bayshore Bikeway, which is pretty well used by commuters and rec riders.

    Anyway, I passed these guys on the same ride (they are on the Bikeway) and they can print the shirts: http://www.ndpt.com/